Oppenheimer & Co. and Stifel are both middle-market banks with identical culture profiles, scoring 3 out of 5 across all five metrics. Both have moderate interviews with 8-12% acceptance rates. Stifel has a larger analyst class of 40-60 versus Oppenheimer's 20-30. Both are diversified financial firms with brokerage and advisory operations. Stifel has grown more aggressively through acquisitions, expanding its investment banking footprint significantly. Oppenheimer is smaller and more New York-focused.
Prep for both firms
Practice interview questions for any bank on this list.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Oppenheimer & Co. vs Stifel (2026)
Oppenheimer & Co.
Middle Market
Stifel
Middle MarketSide-by-Side Comparison
OppenheimerMetricSF
Middle MarketTierMiddle Market
3/5Prestige3/5
3/5Compensation3/5
3/5Training Program3/5
3/5Exit Opportunities3/5
3/5Work-Life Balance3/5
$151000-176000AN1 Total Comp$$155K-$187K
moderateInterview Difficultymoderate
2 roundsInterview Rounds3 rounds
~10-12%Acceptance Rate~8-10%
20-30Analyst Class Size40-60
Healthcare, TMT, IndustrialsTop GroupsHealthcare, TMT, Industrials
Culture Comparison
OppenheimerSF
Prestige
Compensation
Training Program
Exit Opportunities
Work-Life Balance
The Verdict
Choose Stifel for its larger platform and broader coverage from acquisition-driven growth. Choose Oppenheimer if its specific New York-based coverage or smaller team environment appeals to you. Both are similar-tier options with comparable career outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has grown faster?
Stifel has grown more aggressively through acquisitions, significantly expanding its investment banking presence. Oppenheimer has maintained a more stable, smaller footprint.
Which has the bigger platform?
Stifel is larger overall with more analysts and broader coverage. Oppenheimer is smaller and more concentrated in New York.
How do career outcomes compare?
Both score identically at 3 out of 5 across all metrics. Career outcomes are very similar. Neither has a significant advantage over the other.
