1. Warsh used his first Jackson Hole to retire forward guidance, and the market priced a hike anyway.
Kevin Warsh gave his first Jackson Hole keynote as Fed chair at 10am ET on Friday, and he spent it on how the Fed talks instead of where rates go next. Forward guidance as a regular practice, he said, has overstayed its welcome. Transparency about future decisions "is not a virtue unto itself," and a central bank that overcommits "risks creating ambiguity in the name of clarity." He would commit to "a discipline, not to a decision." On inflation he was blunt without promising anything. Over the past twelve months 54% of the goods and services in the PCE basket rose more than 3%, against 32% in the two decades before the pandemic, and he said inflation is unlikely to get back to target on its own. The rest of it was a decent argument that the economy could take a hike: unemployment at 4.1%, business capex up 9% with more than half of it AI buildout, corporate profits up more than 20%. He never used the word hike, or raise, or tighten. Futures went from roughly a one in three chance of a September increase to about a coin flip anyway. The two-year finished the week near 4.35% and the ten-year near 4.72%, with the short end doing most of the moving, so the market repriced the Fed and not the economy. Stocks took it fine: the S&P 500 slipped 0.25% Friday to 7,711.76 and still ended the week up 0.5%, with the Nasdaq up 0.9% and the Dow up 0.5% for its first winning week in three.
Why you care: We ran three hike dissents on August 2, then a negative jobs print killed that trade a week later. It is back, and this time the chair put it there without saying so. September 16 brings the decision and a fresh dot plot.
Interview angle: "Warsh's first Jackson Hole was as much about process as inflation. He killed standing forward guidance, so the market has to price the path off data and tone instead of being handed it, and you saw that live: he never signaled a hike and September odds still went from a third to a coin flip. It changes the modeling too. You cannot anchor a forward curve to Fed guidance that no longer exists, so you widen the rate sensitivity on any LBO or DCF and say why."