Greenhill & Co. and Lazard are both elite boutiques with independent advisory models and strong European connections, but they operate at very different scales. Lazard scores 5 out of 5 for prestige, training, and exit opportunities compared to Greenhill's 4 out of 5 across the board. Lazard scores 5 out of 5 for compensation versus Greenhill's 4 out of 5. Lazard's analyst class of 70-90 is more than double Greenhill's 30-40, and Lazard is significantly more selective at 2-3% acceptance versus 3-4%. Lazard's 175-year history, 40+ global offices, world-class restructuring practice, and dual advisory and asset management platform make it one of the most powerful advisory franchises in the world. Greenhill is a smaller, more focused pure M&A advisory firm that punches above its weight in cross-border transactions. Both share a commitment to independent, conflict-free advisory. Work-life balance is 2 out of 5 at both firms.
Prep for both firms
Practice interview questions for any bank on this list.
Greenhill & Co. vs Lazard (2026)
Greenhill & Co.
Elite Boutique
Lazard
Elite BoutiqueSide-by-Side Comparison
Culture Comparison
Prestige
Compensation
Training Program
Exit Opportunities
Work-Life Balance
The Verdict
Choose Lazard for its significantly higher prestige, broader deal capabilities including restructuring and sovereign advisory, global network, and superior exit opportunities. Lazard is a clear tier above Greenhill on virtually every metric. Choose Greenhill only if you specifically prefer the most intimate boutique environment possible, with maximum partner access in a very small team setting. Greenhill offers a solid elite boutique experience, but candidates with offers from both firms should choose Lazard in nearly every scenario given its clear advantages in brand, deal flow, and career outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
How large is the prestige gap?
Significant. Lazard is in the top tier of elite boutiques alongside Evercore and Centerview, while Greenhill sits in the second tier. Lazard's 175-year heritage, global scale, and consistent league table presence create a meaningful brand advantage.
Both have European roots. Which is stronger in Europe?
Lazard is far stronger in Europe with deep roots in France, offices across the Continent, and dominant advisory positions in multiple European markets. Greenhill has European offices but its scale does not compare to Lazard's Continental presence.
Which provides better analyst experience?
Greenhill provides more intimate deal team dynamics given its tiny class size. Lazard provides more diverse and higher-profile deal exposure. Most candidates would benefit more from Lazard's breadth of experience and stronger brand.
